Letter to the Editor:
Facts about the education propositions are:
PROPOSITION 1
If you vote yes on Proposition 1, you will put the school boards and the parents who elect the boards back in control of the schools. Teachers' unions will be limited to open one year negotiations for wages and health insurance, and must be backed by over 50% of the teachers. Parents can give feedback on teacher performance evaluations.
If you vote no on Proposition 1, you will keep the teachers' unions in control of schools as the teachers unions can continue to negotiate for all management decisions (even deciding when the bell rings) behind closed doors with less than 50% of the teachers. The school boards will continue to lose control, having to agree with them. Parent feedback on teacher performance evaluations are not required.
The NEA has spent $1.1 million to defeat these propositions. The state can't be spending that much taxpayer money to counteract the false ads. The IEA has spent at least .2 million.
PROPOSITION 2:
If you vote yes on proposition 2, effective teachers will be rewarded with bonuses. Effective teachers and effective schools will be rewarded based 70% on how the children progress during the year, only 30% on grades. Tenure will be phased out with the new teachers coming in.
If you vote no on proposition 2, then teachers will continue to be paid by how long they teach. Tenure will continue and school boards will not be able to fire teachers who are not effective.
The misinformation from the unions is that the $38 million for pay for performance is just a transfer of money from teacher's salaries within the education budget. The truth is that the $38 million is extra money added to the education fund from the general fund.
PROPOSITION 3:
If you vote yes on Proposition 3, you will guarantee that each student will have a laptop to use and there will be a two credit on-line course required to graduate. Seniors can take a year's worth of state funded college credits.
If you vote no on proposition 3, there will be no required laptops and the state will have to come up with more money to buy the more expensive textbooks. The two credits of on-line learning is still required by law. College credits must be paid by parents or the students.
The claim is that computers replace teachers. The truth is that they do not replace teachers, but gives teachers more time to help struggling students. Our students have become visual learners. It has been proven that students are motivated by computers.
The assertion is that the local district pays for the upkeep of the computers. The truth is that the state requires the contractor to maintain the upkeep of the computers. Textbooks on the long run are much more expensive than computers.
All of these reform education laws have been enacted in part by some other states so they are not new. Idaho has the most comprehensive reforms so the teachers' unions are fighting the hardest in Idaho. Teachers are paid with taxpayer money to attend many union functions. The union bosses are paid wages that are in the hundreds of thousands.
A meeting to explain this is being held on Wednesday the 17th at 7 pm at the Grangeville Elementary Multipurpose room.
If you have questions, please call 208 962 7718, or go to websites: www.idahofreedomfoundation.org, www.ice-pac.net , or www.YES4Idaho.com
Senator Sheryl Nuxoll
https://chumly.com/n/176acad
No comments:
Post a Comment